Texas Ten Commandments Bill Sparks All-Night Debate: Legal, Political, and Educational Implications of SB10
As Texas lawmakers push to mandate religious displays in public schools, critics warn of constitutional concerns and a growing "assault on religious liberty." Here’s what’s at stake—and what could happen next.
Sign up for The Brief, The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter delivering essential Texas news straight to your inbox.
An All-Night Showdown at the Texas Capitol
In the early hours of Wednesday morning, a determined group of Texans huddled in the frosty corridors of the state Capitol, armed with blankets, snacks, and caffeine. Their mission? To voice their opposition to Senate Bill 10, a controversial proposal requiring every public K-12 classroom to display a poster-sized copy of the Ten Commandments—at least 16 inches wide and 20 inches tall.
By 2 a.m., exhausted advocates napped on benches. By 5 a.m., they rallied for final testimonies, their voices echoing in a near-empty hearing room. Among them was Alexander Shawver, who condemned the bill as an affront to democracy: “When our last opportunity to testify against it is at 6 a.m., it doesn’t feel like democracy is out in the open, as it should be.”
The bill, authored by Sen. Phil King (R-Weatherford) and presented in the House by Rep. Candy Noble (R-Lucas), has reignited fierce debates over religious freedom, education policy, and the role of government in shaping cultural values.
The Bill’s Backers: A "Foundational" Document or State-Sanctioned Religion?
Supporters argue the Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of American legal and moral tradition. “Nothing is more deep-rooted in the fabric of our American tradition of education than the Ten Commandments,” Noble said, comparing them to the Declaration of Independence. She cited the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District—which upheld a coach’s right to pray on a football field—as evidence of shifting legal tides favoring religious expression in public spaces.
However, when pressed by Rep. John Bryant (D-Dallas) about whether the bill had a “religious objective,” Noble demurred, calling the separation of church and state “an interesting question that has been debated a great deal.”
Opponents Warn of Exclusion, Legal Challenges, and Classroom Chaos
Critics, including interfaith coalitions and civil rights groups, argue SB10 sends a message of exclusion to non-Christian students and could spark age-inappropriate discussions. “What does a first grader do when they ask, ‘What is adultery?’” asked Elva Mendoza of the Texas Freedom Network, who testified at 6 a.m. on behalf of her devout Catholic mother. “This is an increasing assault on our religious liberty.”
Organizations like the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR-Texas) and the Sikh Coalition joined forces with progressive advocates to call the bill a distraction from pressing issues like teacher shortages and underfunded special education programs.
Legal experts also warn the bill may violate the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which prohibits government endorsement of religion. While the Supreme Court’s Kennedy decision expanded religious expression rights, SB10’s mandate could face challenges under the “Lemon Test”—a precedent from Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) requiring laws to have a secular purpose.
Political Context: A Shifting Landscape in Austin
The bill’s fate hinges on Texas’ evolving political dynamics:
- Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a vocal supporter, has long pushed for religious displays in schools, including 2021’s “In God We Trust” signage mandate.
- Gov. Greg Abbott and well-funded lobbying groups recently succeeded in passing a school voucher bill after years of failed attempts, signaling stronger conservative influence.
- The House’s new speaker, Dade Phelan, has shown willingness to advance contentious GOP priorities.
Yet time is running short. With the legislative session ending June 2, lawmakers must prioritize. “Tough issues take more time,” said Joshua Blank, a political science professor.
What’s Next for SB10? Predictions and Potential Fallout
-
House Passage Likely, But Legal Battles Loom
With Republican dominance and Abbott’s backing, SB10 could clear the House. However, civil liberties groups like the ACLU are poised to challenge it in court, arguing it violates the Constitution. -
Broader Implications for Education
SB10 is part of a larger trend: bills requiring prayer time (SB11) and mandating BC/AD dating (SB2617) are also advancing. Critics fear a slippery slope toward state-imposed religiosity. - National Spotlight
Texas’ move could inspire similar efforts in states like Florida and Tennessee, where conservative lawmakers have floated comparable measures.
Why This Matters Beyond Texas
The debate reflects a national reckoning over religion’s role in public life. While supporters frame SB10 as a return to “Judeo-Christian values,” opponents see a threat to America’s pluralistic ideals. As Hayden Cohen of Students Engaged in Advancing Texas noted, “If no one comes to oppose the bill, lawmakers will think no Texan cares.”
For now, advocates on both sides are bracing for a marathon—not just an all-night hearing—as Texas becomes the latest battleground in the culture wars.
Disclosure: The Texas Freedom Network, a critic of SB10, has supported The Texas Tribune financially. The Tribune maintains full editorial independence. See our ethics policy here.
Don’t Miss Out: Grab tickets for the 15th annual Texas Tribune Festival (Nov. 13–15) before May 1 for early-bird discounts!
This article has been optimized for SEO with key terms including "Texas Ten Commandments bill," "SB10," "separation of church and state," and "Texas Legislature 2024."
#20hour #wait #speak #predawn #House #panel #takes #Ten #Commandments #bill